<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LII Announce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu</link>
	<description>Legal Information Institute</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court oral arguments week of April 22</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/04/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-april-22/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/04/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-april-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the Supreme court hears 6 cases, some of which involve criminal law and the Hobbs Act. Also being heard are cases of civil rights, employment discrimination, and harassment. The First Amendment and prostitution and sex trafficking are on the agenda as well. Monday, April 22, 2013 11-1221    HILLMAN, JACQUELINE v. MARETTA, JUDY <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/04/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-april-22/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-612" style="margin-left: 15px;margin-right: 15px" alt="supremeleft1.jpg" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11-150x150.jpg" width="88" height="88" /></a>This week the Supreme court hears 6 cases, some of which involve criminal law and the <span>Hobbs Act. Also being heard are cases of civil rights, employment discrimination, and harassment. The First Amendment and prostitution and sex trafficking are on the agenda as well.<br />
</span></p>
<h3></h3>
<p>Monday, April 22, 2013</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>11-1221</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1221">HILLMAN, JACQUELINE <i>v.</i> MARETTA, JUDY A.</a></li>
<li><b>12-10</b>        <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-10">AID, ET AL. <i>v.</i> ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INT’L.</a>
<div></div>
</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<div>Tuesday, April 23, 2013</div>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>11-889</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-889">TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT <i>v.</i> HERRMANN, RUDOLF J., ET AL.</a></li>
<li><b>12-357</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-357">SEKHAR, GIRIDHAR C. <i>v.</i> UNITED STATES</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>Wednesday, April 24, 2013</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>12-484</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-484">UNIV. OF TX SOUTHWESTERN MED. <i>v.</i> NASSAR, NAIEL</a></li>
<li><b>12-547</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-547">METRISH, WARDEN <i>v.</i> LANCASTER, BURT</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/04/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-april-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Oral Arguments week of April 15</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/04/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-april-15/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/04/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-april-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the Supreme Court hears 6 cases. Monday, April 15, 2013 12-167    UNITED STATES v. DAVILA, ANTHONY 12-398    ASSOC. FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY v. MYRIAD GENETICS, INC., ET AL. Tuesday, April 16, 2013 11-798    AM. TRUCKING ASSN., INC. v. LOS ANGELES, CA, ET AL. 12-399    ADOPTIVE COUPLE v. BABY GIRL, ET <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/04/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-april-15/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the Supreme Court hears 6 cases.</p>
<p>Monday, April 15, 2013</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>12-167</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-167">UNITED STATES <i>v.</i> DAVILA, ANTHONY</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>12-398</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-398">ASSOC. FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY <i>v.</i> MYRIAD GENETICS, INC., ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>Tuesday, April 16, 2013</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>11-798</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-798">AM. TRUCKING ASSN., INC. <i>v.</i> LOS ANGELES, CA, ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>12-399</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-399">ADOPTIVE COUPLE <i>v.</i> BABY GIRL, ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>Wednesday, April 17, 2013</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>12-246</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-246">SALINAS, GENOVEVO <i>v.</i> TEXAS</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>12-418</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-418">UNITED STATES <i>v.</i> KEBODEAUX, ANTHONY J.</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/04/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-april-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme court oral arguments week of March 25</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/03/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-march-25/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/03/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-march-25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the Supreme  Court hears 4 cases with topics including the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, Patent Infringement, the Federal Arbitration Act, Same-sex marriage and the Defense of Marriage Act. Monday, March 25, 2013 12-135    OXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC v. SUTTER, JOHN I. 12-416    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, ET AL. <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/03/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-march-25/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-612" style="margin-left: 15px;margin-right: 15px" alt="supremeleft1.jpg" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11-150x150.jpg" width="62" height="62" /></a></h3>
<p>This week the Supreme  Court hears 4 cases with topics including the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, Patent Infringement, the Federal Arbitration Act, Same-sex marriage and the Defense of Marriage Act.</p>
<h3></h3>
<p>Monday, March 25, 2013</p>
<ul>
<li><b>12-135</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-135">OXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC <i>v.</i> SUTTER, JOHN I.</a></li>
<li><b>12-416</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-416">FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION <i>v.</i> WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Tuesday, March 26, 2013</p>
<ul>
<li><b>12-144</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-144">HOLLINGSWORTH, DENNIS, ET AL. <i>v.</i> PERRY, KRISTIN M., ET AL</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Wednesday, March 27, 2013</p>
<ul>
<li><b>12-307</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-307">UNITED STATES <i>v.</i> WINDSOR, EDITH S., ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
<div><i> </i></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/03/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-march-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court oral arguments for week of March 18</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/03/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-march-18/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/03/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-march-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court hears 6 cases next week. Topics include bankruptcy, just compensation, the Food and Drug law, the Vaccine Act, and voter registration. &#160; Monday, March 18, 2013 11-1518    BULLOCK, RANDY C. v. BANKCHAMPAIGN, N.A. 12-71        ARIZONA, ET AL. v. INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL. Tuesday, March 19, 2013 12-142 <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/03/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-march-18/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-612" style="margin-left: 15px;margin-right: 15px" alt="supremeleft1.jpg" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11-150x150.jpg" width="66" height="66" /></a>The Supreme Court hears 6 cases next week. Topics include bankruptcy, just compensation, the Food and Drug law, the Vaccine Act, and voter registration.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Monday, March 18, 2013</p>
<ul>
<li><b>11-1518</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1518">BULLOCK, RANDY C. <i>v.</i> BANKCHAMPAIGN, N.A.</a></li>
<li><b>12-71        </b><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-71">ARIZONA, ET AL. <i>v.</i> INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Tuesday, March 19, 2013</p>
<ul>
<li><b>12-142</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-142">MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO. <i>v.</i> BARTLETT, KAREN L.</a></li>
<li><b>12-236</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-236">SEBELIUS, SEC. OF H&amp;HS <i>v.</i> CLOER, MELISSA</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Wednesday, March 20, 2013</p>
<ul>
<li><b>12-123</b>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-123">HORNE, MARVIN D., ET AL. <i>v.</i> DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE</a></li>
<li><b>12-52</b>      <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-52">DAN&#8217;S CITY USED CARS, INC. <i>v.</i> PELKEY, ROBERT</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/03/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-march-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site tuning as high drama</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/28/site-tuning-as-high-drama/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/28/site-tuning-as-high-drama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LII Associate Director Sara Frug is having a bad day. It’s twelve in the afternoon, East Coast time, and the LII web site has slowed to a crawl. It’s taking 16 seconds to get a page of legal information that you could normally get in 6. The LII’s West Coast audience is just getting to <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/28/site-tuning-as-high-drama/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2013/02/pulling-hair.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1083 alignleft" alt="pulling hair" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2013/02/pulling-hair-150x150.jpg" width="150" height="150" /></a>LII Associate Director Sara Frug is having a bad day. It’s twelve in the afternoon, East Coast time, and the LII web site has slowed to a crawl. It’s taking 16 seconds to get a page of legal information that you could normally get in 6. The LII’s West Coast audience is just getting to the office. Between now and 5 o’clock both East and West Coast people will make heavy use of the site. Things are going from bad to worse, and they will get even worse than that before they get better.</p>
<p>How bad is bad? The typical load average on the LII’s production server is supposed to hover somewhere around 4; that’s what you see on a fully-utilized machine that isn’t straining. Dan Nagy, the LII’s systems administrator, is seeing 39. Dan is not eager to tell you how he knows, but a bad decision made in the course of a tune-up could take it to 300 in about 45 seconds. If that happens, the LII is about as useful as a wet brick. And the LII crew knows: the slow get slower. Anybody who has ever driven on the Boston freeways during the morning rush can see how that works. I-93’s running at capacity, some bozo drops a soda can out the window, and hey-presto, traffic jams solid all the way south to New Bedford.</p>
<p>Sara runs the LII’s crew of engineers. Right now, she is talking to Dan and to Wayne Weibel, the LII’s Drupal developer. They’re looking at the output from <a href="http://WebPageTest.org" target="_blank">WebPageTest.org</a>, a free service that gives a lot of web-performance diagnostics (see below). A couple of things are obvious. The server isn’t clearing connections fast enough. They try a couple of quick alterations to the server configuration. The first shoots the load numbers through the roof, and locks up the server. Oops. Definitely not an improvement. A second is successful. Now the server’s clearing connections fast enough to not bog down completely, so the site’s visitors are getting what they want. But it’s still slow. Time to go under the hood.</p>
<p>A single web page at the LII is made up of a lot of pieces. The home page has 65 separate components. Around 20 of them come from the LII, and the remainder are things like that little Facebook logo with the number of “likes” on the page, which has to be fetched from Facebook every time a visitor shows up. Each LII component can involve multiple database queries that look up text, provide additional links to related information, and so on. Every component comes with a “set-up charge” &#8212; the cost in time of setting up a connection from the user’s browser so that the component can be retrieved. There are a lot of moving parts. The LII uses a variety of strategies that reduce the need to regenerate pages, either holding preassembled pages in a cache to be served up directly, or telling the user’s browser that it’s OK to hang on to pieces that get used repetitively and not reload them. Either approach cuts down on the work the server has to do. Right now, it’s not enough.</p>
<p>Over the next three days, Sara, Wayne, and Dan will spend a lot of time staring at complex “waterfall” diagrams that give a timeline for the loading of each component that goes into the page. The waterfall also shows them what’s waiting for what; some components need others before they can load. They’ll identify bottlenecks and either eliminate them or find a way to make the component smaller so it takes less time to load. The server will be tweaked so that it doesn’t clog up as quickly. Components will be combined so that they can be loaded from a single file, reducing the number of data connections needed and the setup time involved. They’ll get the average page loading time from 7 seconds down to under 4, even during the afternoon rush. Three seconds doesn’t sound like much, but for users, it’s an eternity. During the rush, it’s critical. An average load time of 7 seconds quickly ramps up to 16 seconds or more, because, well, the slow get slower. An average load time of 4 seconds is stable at 4 seconds. The crew think they can get it down to 3. The Director wants 2. The LII audience wants something instantaneous, or even better, telepathy. Sara and the crew will turn this crisis into an opportunity. Suddenly, everybody’s got a lot of good ideas about how to make things even faster and they’re starting to compete with the clock. The team is drag-racing now.</p>
<p>There’s more to all this than speed. Because the server is now on the right side of the loading curve, it can serve around 150 more simultaneous users during rush hour, when there are typically around 1350 simultaneous visitors on the site. That’s an 11% increase. There are also implications for our donors. Throwing hardware at a problem like this can be expensive. None of the changes they’ve made involved upgrading hardware or buying more computing cycles. That’s a good thing; the next biggest server ( a “double extra large”, in cloud-computing-speak) would cost about twice what we’re paying now.</p>
<p>So, more people in the LII audience getting more legal information twice as fast at no increase in cost. What’s not to like about that?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2013/02/Picture-251.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1088" alt="Picture 25" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2013/02/Picture-251.png" width="957" height="972" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/28/site-tuning-as-high-drama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Oral Arguments week of February 25</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-february-25/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-february-25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court hears 6 cases next week. Topics include: Antitrust and the Federal Arbitration Act, DNA and the Fourth Amendment, AEDPA and Habeas Corpus, Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Voting Rights Act, the Death Penalty and ineffective assistance of counsel. &#160; Monday, February 25, 2013 11-10189    TREVINO, CARLOS v. THALER, DIR., TX DCJ 12-126 <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-february-25/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-612" style="margin-left: 15px;margin-right: 15px" alt="supremeleft1.jpg" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11-150x150.jpg" width="75" height="75" /></a>The Supreme Court hears 6 cases next week. Topics include: Antitrust and the Federal Arbitration Act, DNA and the Fourth Amendment, AEDPA and Habeas Corpus, Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Voting Rights Act, the Death Penalty and ineffective assistance of counsel.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Monday, February 25, 2013</em></p>
<ul>
<li>11-10189    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-10189">TREVINO, CARLOS v. THALER, DIR., TX DCJ</a></li>
<li>12-126    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-126">McQUIGGIN, WARDEN v. PERKINS, FLOYD</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Tuesday, February 26, 2013</em></p>
<ul>
<li>12-207    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-207">MARYLAND v. KING, ALONZO J.</a></li>
<li>12-62    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-62">PEUGH, MARVIN v. UNITED STATES</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Wednesday, February 27, 2013</em></p>
<ul>
<li>12-133    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-133">AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, ET AL. v. ITALIAN COLORS RESTAURANT</a></li>
<li>12-96   <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-96"> SHELBY COUNTY, AL v. HOLDER, ATT&#8217;Y GEN., ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/22/supreme-court-oral-arguments-week-of-february-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court oral arguments for week of Feb 19</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-feb-19/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-feb-19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The week of February 19 the Supreme Court hears 4 arguments. Topics include: the Commerce Clause, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Federal Tort Claims Act, Prisoners’ Rights, Sovereign Immunity, Foreign Tax Credit, Income Tax, Internal Revenue Code, First Sale Doctrine, Patent, and Patent Infringement. &#160; Tuesday, February 19, 2013 11-10362    MILLBROOK, KIM v.UNITED <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-feb-19/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-612" style="margin-left: 15px;margin-right: 15px" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="75" height="75" /></a></em></p>
<p>The week of February 19 the Supreme Court hears 4 arguments. Topics include: the Commerce Clause, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Federal Tort Claims Act, Prisoners’ Rights, Sovereign Immunity, Foreign Tax Credit, Income Tax, Internal Revenue Code, First Sale Doctrine, Patent, and Patent Infringement.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Tuesday, February 19, 2013</em></p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-10362</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-10362">MILLBROOK, KIM <em>v.</em>UNITED STATES</a></li>
<li><strong>11-796</strong>         <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-796">BOWMAN, VERNON H. <em>v.</em>MONSANTO CO., ET AL.</a><em><br />
</em></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p><em><strong> </strong>Wednesday, February 20, 2013</em></p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>12-17</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-17">McBURNEY, MARK J., ET AL. <em>v.</em>YOUNG, NATHANIEL L., ET AL.</a></li>
<li><strong>12-43</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-43">PPL CORPORATION <em>v.</em>CIR</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/02/15/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-feb-19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court oral arguments for week of January 14</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/01/11/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-january-14/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/01/11/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-january-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next week the Supreme Court hears arguments including  firearms, sentencing and the Sixth Amendment. Cases also being discussed are the Communications Act, the Medicaid Act, probable cause and search and seizure. &#160; Monday, January 14, 2013 11-9335    ALLEYNE, ALLEN R. v.UNITED STATES 11-9953    BOYER, JONATHAN E. v.LOUISIANA Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11-1351    <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/01/11/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-january-14/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-612" style="margin-left: 15px;margin-right: 15px" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="77" height="77" /></a>Next week the Supreme Court hears arguments including  firearms, sentencing and the Sixth Amendment. Cases also being discussed are the Communications Act, the Medicaid Act, probable cause and search and seizure.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Monday, January 14, 2013</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>11-9335    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-9335">ALLEYNE, ALLEN R. v.UNITED STATES</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>11-9953    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-9953">BOYER, JONATHAN E. v.LOUISIANA</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Tuesday, January 15, 2013</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>11-1351    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1351">LEVIN, STEVEN A. v.UNITED STATES, ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>11-1447    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1447">KOONTZ, COY A. v.ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT.</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Wednesday, January 16, 2013</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>11-1118    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1118">GUNN, JERRY W., ET AL. v.MINTON, VERNON F.</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>11-1545    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1545">ARLINGTON, TX, ET AL. v.FCC, ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>11-1547    CABLE, TELECOMMUNICATIONS &amp; TECH v.FCC, ET AL.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/01/11/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-january-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court oral arguments for week of January 7</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/01/04/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-january-7/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/01/04/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-january-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next week the Supreme Court hears arguments involving the Armed Career Criminal Act, the Discovery Rule, the Driver&#8217;s Privacy Protection Act, and the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. Monday, January 7, 2013 11-1450    STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v.KNOWLES, GREG 11-9540    DESCAMPS, MATTHEW R. v.UNITED STATES Tuesday, January 8, 2013 11-1274    GABELLI, <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/01/04/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-january-7/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-612" style="margin-left: 15px;margin-right: 15px" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="53" height="53" /></a></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: small">Next week the Supreme Court hears arguments involving the Armed Career Criminal Act, the Discovery Rule, the Driver&#8217;s Privacy Protection Act, and the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005.<br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>Monday, January 7, 2013</strong><strong></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-1450</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1450">STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY <em>v.</em>KNOWLES, GREG</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-9540</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-9540">DESCAMPS, MATTHEW R. <em>v.</em>UNITED STATES</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Tuesday, January 8, 2013</strong><strong></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-1274</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1274">GABELLI, MARC J., ET AL. <em>v.</em>SEC</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>12-98</strong>       <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-98">DELIA, SEC., NC DEPT. OF H&amp;HS <em>v.</em>E. M. A., ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Wednesday, January 9, 2013</strong><strong></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-1425</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1425">MISSOURI <em>v.</em>McNEELY, TYLER G.</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>12-25</strong>        <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-25">MARACICH, EDWARD F., ET AL. <em>v.</em>SPEARS, MICHAEL E., ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2013/01/04/supreme-court-oral-arguments-for-week-of-january-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court hears oral arguments for week of Dec 3</title>
		<link>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2012/12/03/supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-for-week-of-dec-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2012/12/03/supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-for-week-of-dec-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>val_kimber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.law.cornell.edu/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the Supreme Court hears 5 cases including Child Abduction, the Clean Water Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and Equitable Tolling. &#160; Monday, December 3, 2012 11-1059    GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORP., ET AL. v.SYMCZYK, LAURA 11-338    DECKER, DOUG, ET AL. v.NORTHWEST ENVTL. DEFENSE CENTER  11-347    GEORGIA-PACIFIC WEST, ET AL. v.NORTHWEST ENVTL. <a href='http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2012/12/03/supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-for-week-of-dec-3/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-612" style="margin-left: 15px;margin-right: 15px" src="http://blog.law.cornell.edu/files/2011/10/supremeleft11-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="61" height="61" /></a>This week the Supreme Court hears 5 cases including Child Abduction, the Clean Water Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and Equitable Tolling.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Monday, December 3, 2012</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-1059</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1059">GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORP., ET AL. <em>v.</em>SYMCZYK, LAURA</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-338</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-338">DECKER, DOUG, ET AL. <em>v.</em>NORTHWEST ENVTL. DEFENSE CENTER</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> <strong>11-347</strong>    GEORGIA-PACIFIC WEST, ET AL. <em>v.</em>NORTHWEST ENVTL. DEFENSE CENTER</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Tuesday, December 4, 2012</strong><strong></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-460</strong>    <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-460">LOS ANGELES CTY. FLOOD CONTROL <em>v.</em>NATURAL RESOURCES, ET AL.</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Wednesday, December 5, 2012</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>11-1347</strong>    C<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-1347">HAFIN, JEFFREY L. <em>v.</em>CHAFIN, LYNN H.</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.law.cornell.edu/blog/2012/12/03/supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-for-week-of-dec-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
