{"id":345,"date":"2011-05-09T12:34:17","date_gmt":"2011-05-09T17:34:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/?p=345"},"modified":"2011-05-23T12:50:34","modified_gmt":"2011-05-23T17:50:34","slug":"library-student-survey-results-access-and-research-services","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/2011\/05\/09\/library-student-survey-results-access-and-research-services\/","title":{"rendered":"Library student survey results: Access and research services"},"content":{"rendered":"
Now for our final post on the Student Satisfaction Survey.\u00a0 In addition to asking about the facility and website, we questioned students on their use of, and satisfaction with, the library\u2019s Access Services and Research Services.\u00a0 Access Services include circulation<\/a>, course reserves, and Interlibrary Loan<\/a>\/Borrow Direct<\/a>.\u00a0 Research Services include the reference desk<\/a> and research consultations<\/a>.\u00a0 Overall, 50% of respondents use the Circulation Desk from a few times per month to a few times per week.\u00a0 An additional one-third uses the desk a few times per semester.\u00a0 Reference Desk use, of course, is less than that of circulation.\u00a0 46% of respondents use reference from a few times per semester to a few times per month, while 6% use the desk quite frequently\u2014from a few times per week to daily.\u00a0 Students are more likely to use reference as they progress through their law school careers with 35% of 1Ls never having used the desk, while only 12% of 3Ls report never using the desk.\u00a0 As expected, journal staff members use reference service more frequently than other students.\u00a0 Research consults, which are a more focused and time-intensive service, have been used by 1\/3 of respondents.<\/p>\n Student satisfaction with Access Services is noteworthy.\u00a0 90% of those who have used the Circulation Desk are mostly to very satisfied, 42% of users are very satisfied.\u00a0 73% of those who have used course reserves, and 73% of those who have used Interlibrary Loan\/Borrow direct are mostly to very satisfied.\u00a0 While more users of course reserve report being \u201cmostly\u201d satisfied as opposed to \u201cvery\u201d satisfied, this is likely due to the availability constraints caused by high demand of certain items.<\/p>\n Student satisfaction with Research Services is similarly high.\u00a0 78% of those who have used the reference desk are mostly to very satisfied with 35% reporting being \u201cvery\u201d satisfied.\u00a0 Research consults are a big hit: 54% of students who have had a research consult are mostly satisfied, while an additional 38% are very satisfied.\u00a0 Most research consults were for either a class paper or a journal note the student was writing.<\/p>\n Comments on the core services, and the Law Library generally, were plentiful.\u00a0 The library is appreciative of both the very positive comments and the constructive ones.\u00a0 Representative responses to the question \u201cWhat do you like most about the Law Library?\u201d include:<\/p>\n We also asked the question \u201cWhat do you like least about the Law Library?\u201d\u00a0 This yielded numerous constructive comments, which overwhelmingly focused on the physical plant.\u00a0 As noted previously, space and temperature issues featured prominently.\u00a0 Representative comments on service issues include:<\/p>\n The library really appreciates these comments as they flesh out the numerical ratings and help us to prioritize items that need to be addressed.\u00a0 The comments regarding course reserve comport with the numerical ratings.\u00a0 These comments will assist both Access Services and Collection Development personnel in making decisions to improve the student experience.<\/p>\n Finally, to gauge interest in additional research services, we asked students \u201cWould you be interested in attending one-hour research workshops presented by the library on a specific topic?\u201d\u00a0 Three out of four indicated that they are somewhat to very interested in such workshops.\u00a0 Related comments were made in response to a question on what else the library should provide.\u00a0 These include:<\/p>\n Overall, the survey confirmed that students are quite pleased with the Law Library and the plethora of services the library provides.\u00a0 It also helped confirm that students do have facility-related issues with cold temperatures and limited space, especially group study space.\u00a0 The survey also highlighted areas within the direct control of the library that need to be addressed, specifically the carrel-assignment procedure, availability of course reserve materials, and the policing of noise and food.<\/p>\n The Law Library greatly appreciates all of those who took time to complete the survey.\u00a0 The feedback, both positive and constructive, is helpful in assessing what works and what does not, and in charting a course for the future.\u00a0 And congratulations to our prize winners: Joseph Pohlkamp (2L) won the reserved study carrel for next fall, and Lilian Balasanian (3L) won the $25 Cornell Store gift card.\u00a0 Awesome!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Now for our final post on the Student Satisfaction Survey.\u00a0 In addition to asking about the facility and website, we questioned students on their use of, and satisfaction with, the library\u2019s Access Services and Research Services.\u00a0 Access Services include circulation, course reserves, and Interlibrary Loan\/Borrow Direct.\u00a0 Research Services include the reference desk and research consultations.\u00a0 […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[316],"tags":[300,310],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=345"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":347,"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345\/revisions\/347"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n