skip navigation
search

its-aliveI’m proud to announce the debut of the Journal of Open Access to Law, a multidisciplinary journal that will publish the work that its title suggests:  research related to legal information that is made openly available on the Internet.   Conceived in a series of meetings over the last five years, and put finally into motion at the last two LVI conferences, it has been a long time coming.  But I think you’ll see that the wait has been worth it.  We should all give a big round of applause to Pompeu Casanovas and Enrico Francesconi for long and diligent work, and most especially to Ginevra Peruginelli, who has suggested, demanded, coaxed, scolded, edited, negotiated, and otherwise caused the new publication to come into being.   A host of others — visible on the masthead — have served as section editors, reviewers, and (of course) as authors.  A special acknowledgement goes to Jon Bing and to Peter Suber, who have written forewords framing our collective effort.

You can read the new journal at http://joal.law.cornell.edu/ .

As to what we intend:

Two ideas motivate JOAL.  The first is that there should be a place to present work about open access to law that can stand on its own.  Because it is so often imagined as “law-and” research, our work is communicated via the journals of other disciplines, and sometimes its unique flavor has been lost.  Too, open access to law touches and is touched by research on a number of levels:  work in information science that provides practical publishing, organizing, and retrieval techniques; policy research that addresses the “why” of open access to law;  and open access as a new-found agora in which the public is encountering legal information and, as a result, acting in ways that are very poorly understood.  The second idea is that academic research needs, most of all, to find an audience within the community of legal publishers who can make good use of it for practical ends.

I hope you’ll like it.

5 Responses to “Announcing the debut of JOAL”

  1. This is great, and I’ve just plugged it at Lawyerist. Just one question: why oh why are the full articles only available in PDF format?

    You’ve put them online and made them free, which is awesome. Now give us HTML we can more-easily read and share!

  2. Have the editors decided how often the journal will appear each year, the number of issues per volume? Thank you.

  3. Sam:
    There’s no completely compelling reason, and I believe that the OJS software would allow us to publish the originals in parallel. We’ll likely do so in the future. However, bear in mind that for many who mostly do science, the usual path is to compose in laTeX and publish in PDF, which had some influence here.

    I don’t particularly like PDF either, but FWIW I’m not sure the usual repurposing arguments would apply here.

    T

  4. Patrick:
    No final decision, but likely twice per year. What’s a “volume”? 🙂
    T.

  5. There’s not any totally persuasive motive, and also I really believe how the OJS computer software will allow all of us to create the originals inside parallel. We’ll probable implement it sometime soon. Nevertheless, keep in mind those of you that generally complete scientific disciplines, the most common way is to write inside laTeX and also post inside PDF FILE, which often got some affect right here.

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)